| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 29 | |
| 1. |  | MANCASSOLA, V.; ALLIAUME, F.; LADO, B.; QUINCKE, A.; PUENTES, R. Comparación de métodos para determinar la estabilidad estructural en suelos del Uruguay. Resumen: 172. In: Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencias de Suelo, 22.; 2do Congreso Uruguayo de Suelos, 2; Encuentro de la SUCS, 10. Diversidad Productiva:
pilar del manejo sostenible de los suelos. Montevideo, Uruguay: SUCS; SLSC, 2019. [Presentación Oral] + [Resumen].| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|    |
| 2. | | GUTIÉRREZ, L.; LADO, B.; GONZÁLEZ, P.; SILVA, P.; QUINCKE, M. Handling Genotype-By-Environment Interaction in Genomic Selection to Predict New Genotypes and New Environments. [P0814] In: International Plant & Animal Genome, Conference PAG XXIV, "The largest Ag-genomics Meeting in the World San Diego, CA, USA; January 9-13, 2016. [Abstract] .| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 4. | | CASTRO, M.; VÁZQUEZ, D.; VON ZITZEWITZ, J.; LADO, B. Influence of terminal drought stress on wheat agronomic traits, industrial quality and dehydrin proteins. In: INTERNATIONAL WHEAT CONFERENCE, 8., 2010 , St. Petersburg, RU. Abstracts...: wheat genetics and breeding for abiotic stresses; poster presentations. St. Petersburg, RU: VIR, 2010. p. 157.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|  |
| 6. | | PEDROZO, P.; MOLTINI, A.; PINTOS, P.; LUQUE, E.; VICENTE, E.; LADO, B.; FARIÑA, L.; LADO, J. Avances y desafíos en la mejora del sabor de nuestras frutillas. Agroalimentos. Revista INIA Uruguay, Diciembre 2021, no.67, p.63-67. (Revista INIA; 67).| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 7. | | LADO,B.; BATTENFIELD, S.; POLAND, J.; QUINCKE, M.; SILVA, P.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. Comparación de metodologías de predicción de cruzamientos para rendimiento en trigo. MV 14 - COMUNICACIONES LIBRES - MV. MEJORAMIENTO VEGETAL In: JOURNAL OF BASIC & APPLIED GENETICS, 2016, Vol.27, Iss. 1 (Supp.). XVI LATIN AMERICAN CONGRESS OF GENETICS, IV CONGRESS OF THE URUGUAYAN SOCIETY OF GENETICS, XLIX ANNUAL MEETING OF THE GENETICS SOCIETY OF CHILE, XLV ARGENTINE CONGRESS OF GENETICS, 9-12 October 2016. PROCEEDINGS. Montevideo (Uruguay): SAG, 2016 p. 287.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 8. | | GUTIERREZ, L.; BORGES, A.; QUERO, G.; GONZALEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.; BERRO, I.; LADO, B.; CASTRO, A. Biostatistical tools for plant breeding in the genomics era. In: German, S.; Quincke, M.; Vázquez, D.; Castro, M.; Pereyra, S.; Silva, P.; García, A. (Eds.). Seminario Internacional "1914-2014: Un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela". Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2018. p.46-57. (INIA Serie Técnica; 241).| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 9. | | WLASIUK, B.; RAMOS, S.; ARIAS-SIBILLOTTE, M.; LADO, B.; CABRERA, D.; RODRIGUEZ, P.; SEVERINO, V. Evaluation of different bud break promoters on 'Williams' (Pyrus communis L.) pear. [Conference paper]. Acta Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 305-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.43 Article history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 10. | | LADO, B.; GONZÁLEZ BARRIOS, P.; QUINCKE, M.; SILVA, P.; GUTIÉREZ, L. Genomic selection in wheat breeding program modelling genotype by environment interaction using mixed models. In: International Wheat Conference, 9., 2015, Sydney, AU. Program and abstracts: posters. Sidney: ICMS Australasia, 2015. p. 168.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 11. | | LADO, B.; MATUS, I.; BELZILE, F.; POLAND, J.; QUINCKE, M.; CASTRO, M.; VON ZITZEWITZ, J. Genotipado por secuenciación en trigo (Triticum aestivum). In: JORNADAS DE LA SOCIEDAD DE BIOQUÍMICA Y BIOLOGÍA MOLECULAR , 8., SIMPOSIO BIOLOGÍA Y BIOTECNOLOGÍA VEGETAL, 11., 2013. Resumen. Montevideo: SBBM, SUB, 2013.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 13. | | LADO, B.; VÁZQUEZ, D.; QUINCKE, M.; SILVA, P.; AGUILAR, I.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. Resource allocation optimization with multi-trait genomic prediction for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) baking quality. [Original article]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1 December 2018, Volume 131, Issue 12, pp. 2719-2731. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received: 29 January 2018 / Accepted: 10 September 2018 / Published online: 19 September 2018.
Supplementary materials.
Acknowledgements: We express our appreciation for the effort of the technical personnel of INIA La...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 15. | | SILVA, P.; LADO, B.; BRANDARIZ, S.; PEREYRA, S.; GERMAN, S.; VON ZITZEWITZ, J.; GUTIÉRREZ, L.; QUINCKE, M. Herramientas utilizadas y avances en mejoramiento molecular en el Programa de Mejoramiento Genético de Trigo de INIA Uruguay.[Presentación oral]. In: SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL DE TRIGO, 2014, La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. GERMÁN, S., et al. (Org.). 1914-2014, un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela: un valioso legado para el futuro: presentaciones; resúmenes. La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY: INIA, 2014. p. 81.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 16. | | SILVA, P.; LADO, B.; BRANDARIZ, S.; BERRO, I.; GUTIÉRREZ, L.; PEREYRA, S.; GERMAN, S.; VON ZITZEWITZ, J.; QUINCKE, M. Herramientas utilizadas y avances en mejoramiento molecular en el programa de mejoramiento genético de trigo de Inia Uruguay. In: German, S.; Quincke, M.; Vázquez, D.; Castro, M.; Pereyra, S.; Silva, P.; García, A. (Eds.). Seminario Internacional "1914-2014: Un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela". Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2018. p. 277-285. (INIA Serie Técnica; 241).| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 17. | | MORA, F.; CASTILLO, D.; LADO, B.; MATUS, I.; POLAND, J.; BELZILE, F.; VON ZITZEWITZ, J.; DEL POZO, A. Genome-wide association mapping of agronomic traits and carbon isotope discrimination in a worldwide germplasm collection of spring wheat using SNP markers. Molecular Breeding, 2015, v,35, no.2, 12 p.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 18. | | LADO, B.; BATTENFIELD, S.; SILVA, P.; QUINCKE, M.; GUZMAN, C.; SINGH, R.P.; DREISIGACKER, S.; PEÑA, J.; FRITZ, A.; POLAND, J.; GUTIERREZ, L. Comparing strategies to select crosses using genomic prediction in two wheat breeding programs. In: International Wheat Genetics Symposium, 12, Tulln, Austria; April 23-28, 2017; BOKU: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria. p.88-90.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 19. | | BRANDARIZ, S.P.; GONZÁELZ-REYMÚNDEZ, A.; LADO, B.; QUINCKE, M.; VON ZITZEWITZ, J.; CASTRO, M.; MATUS, I.; DEL POZO, A.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. Effect of using imputed missing data on QTL detection on a wheat GWAS panel. In: SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL DE TRIGO, 2014, La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. GERMÁN, S., et al. (Org.). 1914-2014, un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela: un valioso legado para el futuro: posters; resúmenes. La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY: INIA, 2014. p. 86.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 20. | | BRANDARIZ, S.P.; GONZÁLEZ-REYMÚNDEZ, A.; LADO, B.; QUINCKE, M.; VON ZITZEWITZ, J.; CASTRO, M.; MATUS, I.; DEL POZO, A.; GUTIÉRREZ , L. Effect of using imputed missing data on QTL detection on a wheat GWAS panel. [Poster]. In: German, S.; Quincke, M.; Vázquez, D.; Castro, M.; Pereyra, S.; Silva, P.; García, A. (Eds.). Seminario Internacional "1914-2014: Un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela". Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2018. p. 304. (INIA Serie Técnica; 241).| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 29 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
12/12/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
12/12/2017 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
|
Autor : |
LADO, B.; BATTENFIELD, S.; SILVA, P.; QUINCKE, M.; GUZMAN, C.; SINGH, R.P.; DREISIGACKER, S.; PEÑA, J.; FRITZ, A.; POLAND, J.; GUTIERREZ, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
BETTINA LADO, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.; SARAH BATTENFIELD, AgriPro Wheat, Syngenta, 11783 Ascher Rd. Junction City, KS, 66441, USA.; MARIA PAULA SILVA VILLELLA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS GUZMAN, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico, Mexico.; RAVI P. SINGH, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico, Mexico.; SUSANNE DREISIGACKER, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico, Mexico.; JAVIER PEÑA, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico, Mexico.; ALLAN FRITZ, Wheat Genetics Resource Center, Department of Plant Pathology, 1712 Claflin Rd., Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA; .; JESSE POLAND, Wheat Genetics Resource Center, Department of Plant Pathology, 1712 Claflin Rd., Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.; LUCIA GUTIERREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706, USA. |
|
Título : |
Comparing strategies to select crosses using genomic prediction in two wheat breeding programs. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: International Wheat Genetics Symposium, 12, Tulln, Austria; April 23-28, 2017; BOKU: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria. |
|
Páginas : |
p.88-90. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
Key message: Evaluation of crosses prediction methods with and without accounting for progeny variance. Mid-parent values was a much larger factor determining genetic gain than increasing the progeny variance of a cross.
In wheat breeding programs, a critical decision is to determine crosses that have high probability to deliver progenies with higher genetics gains (Zhong & Jannink 2007, Bernardo 2014). We present an application of genomic models for predicting parental cross combinations for grain yield, grain protein, and loaf volume across two wheat-breeding programs, INIA-Uruguay and CIMMYT. We evaluated three methods for selecting the ?best? crosses based on (1) mid-parents, (2) top 10% of the progeny within a cross, and (3) maximizing mean and variance within progeny using thresholds. The last two methods were evaluated with the predicted variances obtained through progeny simulation using the PopVar (Mohammadi et al. 2015, Tiede et al. 2015) package in R software. The first two methods showed 82% of crosses in common for yield, 55% for loaf volume and 53% for grain protein, even though only the second method accounts for the variance of the progeny (Figure 1). While the expected variance of the progeny is important to increase chances of finding superior individuals from transgressive segregation, we observed that the mid-parent values of the crosses selected was a much larger factor determining genetic gain than increasing the progeny variance of a cross (Figure 2). Overall, the genomic resources and the statistical models are now available to plant breeders to predict both the performance of breeding lines per se as well as the value of progeny from any potential crosses, but further understanding on optimizing the cross combinations is needed. MenosKey message: Evaluation of crosses prediction methods with and without accounting for progeny variance. Mid-parent values was a much larger factor determining genetic gain than increasing the progeny variance of a cross.
In wheat breeding programs, a critical decision is to determine crosses that have high probability to deliver progenies with higher genetics gains (Zhong & Jannink 2007, Bernardo 2014). We present an application of genomic models for predicting parental cross combinations for grain yield, grain protein, and loaf volume across two wheat-breeding programs, INIA-Uruguay and CIMMYT. We evaluated three methods for selecting the ?best? crosses based on (1) mid-parents, (2) top 10% of the progeny within a cross, and (3) maximizing mean and variance within progeny using thresholds. The last two methods were evaluated with the predicted variances obtained through progeny simulation using the PopVar (Mohammadi et al. 2015, Tiede et al. 2015) package in R software. The first two methods showed 82% of crosses in common for yield, 55% for loaf volume and 53% for grain protein, even though only the second method accounts for the variance of the progeny (Figure 1). While the expected variance of the progeny is important to increase chances of finding superior individuals from transgressive segregation, we observed that the mid-parent values of the crosses selected was a much larger factor determining genetic gain than increasing the progeny variance of a cross (Figure 2)... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
WHEAT BREEDING PROGRAMS; WHEAT QUALITY. |
|
Thesagro : |
MEJORAMIENTO GENETICO DE PLANTAS; TRIGO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02689nam a2200289 a 4500
001 1057873
005 2017-12-12
008 2017 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d
100 1 $aLADO, B.
245 $aComparing strategies to select crosses using genomic prediction in two wheat breeding programs.
260 $aIn: International Wheat Genetics Symposium, 12, Tulln, Austria; April 23-28, 2017; BOKU: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.$c2017
300 $ap.88-90.
520 $aKey message: Evaluation of crosses prediction methods with and without accounting for progeny variance. Mid-parent values was a much larger factor determining genetic gain than increasing the progeny variance of a cross. In wheat breeding programs, a critical decision is to determine crosses that have high probability to deliver progenies with higher genetics gains (Zhong & Jannink 2007, Bernardo 2014). We present an application of genomic models for predicting parental cross combinations for grain yield, grain protein, and loaf volume across two wheat-breeding programs, INIA-Uruguay and CIMMYT. We evaluated three methods for selecting the ?best? crosses based on (1) mid-parents, (2) top 10% of the progeny within a cross, and (3) maximizing mean and variance within progeny using thresholds. The last two methods were evaluated with the predicted variances obtained through progeny simulation using the PopVar (Mohammadi et al. 2015, Tiede et al. 2015) package in R software. The first two methods showed 82% of crosses in common for yield, 55% for loaf volume and 53% for grain protein, even though only the second method accounts for the variance of the progeny (Figure 1). While the expected variance of the progeny is important to increase chances of finding superior individuals from transgressive segregation, we observed that the mid-parent values of the crosses selected was a much larger factor determining genetic gain than increasing the progeny variance of a cross (Figure 2). Overall, the genomic resources and the statistical models are now available to plant breeders to predict both the performance of breeding lines per se as well as the value of progeny from any potential crosses, but further understanding on optimizing the cross combinations is needed.
650 $aMEJORAMIENTO GENETICO DE PLANTAS
650 $aTRIGO
653 $aWHEAT BREEDING PROGRAMS
653 $aWHEAT QUALITY
700 1 $aBATTENFIELD, S.
700 1 $aSILVA, P.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, M.
700 1 $aGUZMAN, C.
700 1 $aSINGH, R.P.
700 1 $aDREISIGACKER, S.
700 1 $aPEÑA, J.
700 1 $aFRITZ, A.
700 1 $aPOLAND, J.
700 1 $aGUTIERREZ, L.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
